Coca-Cola’s dairy brand Fairlife spent eleven days completely offline in July. A ransomware group calling itself Anubis broke into Fairlife’s production systems, forcing a shutdown across all four U.S. plants, according to a filing Coca-Cola made with the SEC.
Two weeks later, Coca-Cola turned in one of its strongest quarters in years.
The company posted adjusted earnings of 97 cents a share on July 28, ahead of the 93 cents Wall Street expected, according to CNBC.
Revenue rose 7% to $13.4 billion. Shares climbed more than 7% that morning and touched a record high, CNBC reported, as investors shrugged off the cyberattack entirely.
Morgan Stanley didn’t wait for the dust to settle. Analyst Dara Mohsenian and his team raised their price target on Coca-Cola (KO) to $100 from $89 and kept the stock as their top pick in the beverage sector, according to a Morgan Stanley research note. Their reasoning goes well beyond one clean print.
The bank’s real argument is structural. Coca-Cola’s organic sales growth, unit case volume combined with pricing, came in at 7%, well above the 5% consensus, the note said.
Unit case volume alone grew 5%, more than double the 2.2% analysts had modeled. Morgan Stanley frames that gap as proof Coke’s growth engine now runs in a different league than its consumer-staples peers, not as a one-quarter fluke.
Related: Coca-Cola just made a big change to how it looks
Coke’s edge shows up in the boring data
The scanner numbers back that up. Coca-Cola has outpaced PepsiCo (PEP) and Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) in U.S. Nielsen scanner sales by roughly 400 basis points and beaten mega-cap staples peers by nearly 300 basis points, per Morgan Stanley’s research.
That’s the kind of durable, unglamorous outperformance that doesn’t show up in a single World Cup promotion. It shows up quarter after quarter, which is exactly what makes analysts comfortable paying up for the stock.
Pricing power tells a similar story. Coke pushed through roughly 3% pricing in the quarter even as rivals PepsiCo and Keurig Dr Pepper lean harder on their own price hikes to offset weakness in snacks and coffee, the note added.
In a consumer environment CEO Henrique Braun has called “dynamic,” per CNBC, that kind of pricing muscle is not something every staples company still has.
Not everyone agrees the story is that simple. Morningstar’s Kristoffer Inton reiterated caution on Coca-Cola’s valuation even after the beat, arguing PepsiCo offers more room to run, according to Stocktwits.
Morgan Stanley’s own $100 target sits well above the broader analyst consensus near $87, which is precisely the kind of gap that makes this call worth watching rather than dismissing.
Derek White / Getty Images
Fairlife’s growth held up despite eleven days of chaos
The most underappreciated number in the entire quarter sits inside Fairlife. Even with U.S. production paused for nearly two weeks, the brand’s sales still grew 18% year over year, according to Morgan Stanley’s research note.
Coca-Cola said it had resumed the majority of Fairlife’s U.S. production by the time it reported earnings, with CEO Braun saying, “We feel really good about the governance and the speed” of the response.
That resilience matters for what comes next. Morgan Stanley calculates Fairlife alone could add more than 100 basis points a year to Coke’s corporate sales growth over the long term as capacity constraints ease.
A brand that grew through a total production shutdown gives that estimate more credibility, not less.
More Coca-Cola:
- Coca-Cola just made a big change to how it looks
- Coke is thriving on same consumer behavior Pepsi says is fading
- Coca-Cola looks set to bring back new take on giant failure
Not every region cooperated for Coca-Cola
Asia Pacific was the exception. Price and mix in the region fell 9%, far worse than the roughly flat number analysts expected, dragged down by investment timing and affordability programs aimed at price-sensitive shoppers in markets like China, per the note.
Unit case growth in the region still came in strong at 8%, and Morgan Stanley expects easier pricing comparisons to show up by the fourth quarter.
That distinction, between a soft pricing metric and actual weak demand, is where a lot of quick headline reactions on Coca-Cola’s quarter got it wrong. Investors selling on the APAC pricing miss would have missed the more important signal underneath it.
Coca-Cola’s stock trades near 27 times forward earnings now, a premium few other packaged food and beverage names can command.
That premium increasingly reflects less about carbonated soda and more about a company that can absorb a ransomware attack, a soft pricing quarter in its biggest growth region, and a jittery consumer environment all at once and still come out ahead of estimates.
The next real test isn’t another quarter of pricing power. It’s whether Coca-Cola’s operational discipline, the kind that got Fairlife’s plants running again inside two weeks, keeps holding up as the company leans harder on that very same playbook across the rest of its portfolio.
Investors evaluating consumer staples now have another variable to weigh beyond pricing power and volume: how fast a company’s operations recover when something goes wrong. Coca-Cola just answered that question in real time, and the market rewarded the answer.
Related: Costco’s members get 1 big benefit they may not even think about
